I didn’t mean to write a fourth article today… but I was poking the box, and this is what came up.
How do you tell the vibration of a “modality” without having permission to muscletest?
If there has ever been a good reason to ban me from measuring vibration, this would be probably the best: turning all the power over to you.
Why? Because there should never be anything or anyone between you and Source. Not me, not a book, not a church, not anything. Why? Because that would be idol worshiping, that would be taking away your power, that would be turning you to sheep.
Now, my experience has been that people turn themselves to sheep: shame on you.
I understand: it is scary to take responsibility for your choices, for your questions, for your answers, for your direction. But…
You weren’t created to be sheep. You are made of the same matter as Source, thinking stuff, powerful stuff. Not sheep stuff.
Now, if you are sheep, you can stop reading here: you and I have nothing to talk about.
But if you are ready to take back your power, then stay with me. I am going to teach you where to look, what to take into consideration, to make your judgment about the vibration and truth value of a modality.
Deciding on the vibration of a person is harder, and I can’t tell you how to do it: I have not idea myself.
But modalities are a much easier thing to evaluate, so let’s look together, ok?
Let’s use this Janet Conner: Writing Down Your Soul book, course, whatever, as a text item, ok?
What does Janet Conner teach? Let’s see if you can find the level of truth in it?
Janet Conner says: your soul wants to:
1. connect with Source
2. commit to values
3. serve a purpose
4. express itself
5. create a life
and here is Janet Conner’s video: watch it. Listen to the tone of voice, the mood, the level of honesty, the level of hypnotic (bs-ing you) language and sounds. Watch her hands, her story, and compare it how it is.
Now, I am not saying that we know the truth: “Truth: collective hunch at best” is where I come from. Even if it comes from a meditation or a “conversation” with Source, it is still just a hunch.
My muscletesting have shown that the closer the “modality”, the worldview is to what I’ve been teaching, The Original Design, the higher the truth value of the modality, and the higher its vibration.
Please try your hand on this.
You may need to do a lot more reading on my site, you may need to come to the connection calls, but in the end it will be worth it: you will be able to make your own judgments, and cut out the middleman, me.
I will read all the comments, and lead you to the truth that way… stay with this. Make sure you subscribe to the comments on this post… this is like a mini-course.
Let me measure your vibration?
Click on the link to request a vibrational reading…
The Map of Consciousness will show you what it means.
sorry sophie, the content is ‘stuff’ i’ve learnt from many sources but i still don’t’feel’ the connection to source,,
although i’ve had many times in my life when source has answered in most uncommon ways that i’ve either been thinking or feeling,, (and some very funny but unmistakable) ,,, and mostly when i’m not expecting it, and sometimes in an instant,,, the content in video all good to me, if in fact you already are in partnership with your source,, but that doesn’t happen very often for me and it didn’t with the video
ok then, i’ll go & look at the content!
ok. what I wanted to hear is that the way this woman talks is not consistent with the Original Design. Not in the least. And she doesn’t even TALK about source… she doesn’t know about the agreement of soul and Source… and the role of humanity.
It is all garden variety bullshit… content, feeling, context, all… in this video and in this woman’s work.
Thank you Bernie and everybody… I am done with this post… don’t leave more comments, please.
i felt nothing watching the video apart from the fact that it was a ‘text book’ thingie and that she is probably no more in touch with source than i am,,,,, ahhhh,, well, back to the drawing board!
thank you Bernie. good luck. look at context and content
why is no one looking at the content… you cannot trust your feelings guys… you are looking at the wrong place!
interesting… so far everyone’s opinion was subjective.
I started watching the video convinced I would be disgusted. Yes, I allowed myself to be lead into an opinion beforehand.
After a minute or so of watching I noticed that I was actually not reacting at all, just watching. She’s expressive and used some pretty words which could have been compelling at other moments. Until she started with the second hand. Oh shit! She just started talking in the way a lot of people do with children and which I find incredibily disrespectful to any person of any age. That’s when I stopped the video without any intentions of ever watching it again.
Aside from my physical response to her, I thought: who is she, to know what the soul wants? Her 5 things felt random and just because she aimed to sound like the authority in this field, it didn’t sound true to me.
Just notice that you are opinionating from a subjective place still… and not from a complete world view.
Of course, there are no assurances that your world view is better than hers, but it is a safe place to start from. What is the world view you learn on this site?
is this how you get to the truth normally? could it be that someone would sound good, sound true, but be bs and you would not react? worth testing with some of your former teachers.
I am interested in distinguishing something out there, instead of your reaction…
Watching her, made every cell in my body squirm. I found her utterly repelling.
Yes Matsa, it seems that lots of people get convinced. When someone speaks directly to someone’s Tree of Knowledge, it makes sense to them, and they go for it.
Oh my, oh my, what a video. Can anybody get convinced with such an acting?